Page 19 - Module_2_EN
P. 19

As shown on Figure 2, IEA is an ongoing process. It aims to improve decision making, enhance national   Module
                   capacities, and provide systematically collected, analyzed and presented information. Activities and

                   outputs can be identified for every stage, and these, along with expected outcomes, provide a basis   2
                   for evaluation, learning and improvement. Besides internal learning, the fact that many countries
                   use the IEA approach presents an opportunity for sharing lessons learned across a wide range
                   of initiatives. It is necessary to define expected results at different stages (Figure 2).  Technical and

                   political partners will identify lessons learned from the process and thus can improve it. As such, the
                   process is enriched by continuous feedback at the national level, and information is often exchanged   Abu Dhabi, UAE
                   with other countries using a GEO approach.





                        BOX 6A      National IEA process in West Asia






                       (Lebanon Case: SoE 2001)

                       One of the key features of the IEA process following the GEO approach is its flexibility. The following
                       description illustrates the process followed in national IEA initiatives supported by UNEP in the
                       West Asia region.
                       1.  The Ministry of Environment contracted ECODIT Liban (a private organization) to assist
                           it in preparing the 2001 State of the Environment Report (SoER).

                       2.  ECODIT suveyed, reviewed available sources of information and identified existing data
                           and information as well as gaps.

                       3.  Preparation and presentation of a methodology.

                       4.  ECODIT  and MoE/LEDO (Lebanese Environment and Development Observatory)
                           agreed on the general format of the SoER.

                       5.  Holding a number of internal meetings with the MoE/LEDO Follow-Up Committee and
                           with key MoE employees in various departments, as well as project staff.  These meetings
                           helped identify key policies and actions pertinent to major environmental issues.
                       6.  Contacting  and meeting  with a  number of key individuals and  organizations, both
                           governmental and non-governmental.

                       7.  Delivering  intermediary  outputs  including a  prototype  of transport  section  before
                           drafting the whole report.








                          IEA Training Manual   Workshop for the National Reporting Toolkit (NRT)   17
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24